| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 16.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 20.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
| Motherboard | OEM OEM (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20080118 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 26 '19 at 23:50 |
| Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
| Run User | UZB-User |
| Background CPU | 80% |
PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Duo E4600
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
|
33.6%
Below average
|
25% 32.1 Pts
|
5% 37.5 Pts
|
3% 48.5 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Nvidia(10DE 105F) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 431.60
|
16.3%
Very poor
|
18% 19.7 fps
|
13% 16.1 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
13.1%
Very poor
|
11% 4 GB/s
|
10% 3.43 GB/s
|
32% 123 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical OEM Builds (Compare 99 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: OEM OEM
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 13x |
| Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples | 7x |
| Core i5-3317UIntel $225Bench 47%, 26,848 samples | 4x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 12x |
| HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples | 11x |
| GeForce 9500 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 27,834 samples | 9x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $89 |