Performance Results


Gaming 61% Destroyer	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 63% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	58.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4 (all builds)
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190612
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 26 '19 at 23:05
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	96.8% Outstanding	Memory 81.6 1-Core 151 2-Core 305 96% 179 Pts	4-Core 599 8-Core 1,160 104% 880 Pts	64-Core 1,446 90% 1,446 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 96.8% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Zotac(19DA 1438) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 431.60 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	58.5% Above average	Lighting 72.6 Reflection 73.8 Parallax 64.5 59% 70.3 fps	MRender 71 Gravity 68.5 Splatting 70 57% 69.9 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 898GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 449 448 450 447 434 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 497 Write 448 Mixed 443 SusWrite 445 103% 458 MB/s	4K Read 38.7 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 51.7 179% 64 MB/s	DQ Read 225 DQ Write 190 DQ Mixed 204 154% 206 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 133%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB 14,526 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 346GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	19.7% Very poor	Read 42 Write 38.5 Mixed 40 SusWrite 25 8% 36.4 MB/s	4K Read 14 4K Write 15.6 4K Mixed 14.6 48% 14.7 MB/s	DQ Read 33 DQ Write 29.8 DQ Mixed 30.1 23% 31 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 19.7% Great: 97%
Seagate BUP Slim SL 2TB 8,475 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 178GB free Firmware: 0302 SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 16 17 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	17% Very poor	Read 42 Write 32.7 Mixed 33.5 SusWrite 16.8 23% 31.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 169% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 17% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB-$73 54,616 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	82.7% Excellent	MC Read 31.5 MC Write 24.1 MC Mixed 32.9 84% 29.5 GB/s	SC Read 23.3 SC Write 23.7 SC Mixed 31 74% 26 GB/s	Latency 77.5 52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 82.7% Great: 129%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 124%

UFO

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 117%

UFO

SSD
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBWD $74Bench 228%, 180,890 samples	110x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	102x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	68x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	99x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	74x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	73x

Value: 100% - Outstanding

Total price: $598

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16