Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	38.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6300-$47 261,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 4 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	64.8% Good	Memory 88.9 1-Core 67.1 2-Core 128 59% 94.6 Pts	4-Core 225 8-Core 307 34% 266 Pts	64-Core 308 19% 308 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.39 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	38.7% Below average	Lighting 34.8 Reflection 79.5 Parallax 68.5 28% 60.9 fps	MRender 71.8 Gravity 70.8 Splatting 72.3 59% 71.6 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba HG5d Q Series 128GB 2,624 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 10GB free (System drive) Firmware: HTGAN102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 66 64 69 58 59 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	40.4% Average	Read 299 Write 108 Mixed 200 SusWrite 62.5 37% 167 MB/s	4K Read 12.3 4K Write 55.7 4K Mixed 18.6 72% 28.9 MB/s	DQ Read 31.5 DQ Write 83 DQ Mixed 42.7 37% 52.4 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 40.4% Great: 102%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 152GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 229 267 289 297 296 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	76.9% Very good	Read 374 Write 364 Mixed 303 SusWrite 268 74% 327 MB/s	4K Read 32.1 4K Write 67.1 4K Mixed 40.8 136% 46.7 MB/s	DQ Read 39.9 DQ Write 94.2 DQ Mixed 55.3 46% 63.1 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 76.9% Great: 134%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA330 1TB 8,831 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 104GB free Firmware: JP4OA3MA SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 70 69 73 62 63 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	37.7% Below average	Read 63.1 Write 55.3 Mixed 36.5 SusWrite 68 41% 55.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 37.7% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 2x4GB 9,036 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	44.7% Average	MC Read 19.7 MC Write 12.1 MC Mixed 15.6 45% 15.8 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 11.4 29% 10 GB/s	Latency 68.5 58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 84%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 29%

Raft

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	8x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	7x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	6x

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $627

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16