PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 33.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 58.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | Dell Precision Tower 5810 |
Motherboard | Dell Precision Tower 5810 (all builds) |
Memory | 26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20170301 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jul 26 '19 at 11:59 |
Run Duration | 129 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 5% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
|
62.2%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro M4000
Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.58
|
33.7%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Micron 1100 SATA 256GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: L003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 128 138 146 147 146 MB/s
|
58.6%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
924GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 135 148 155 153 155 MB/s
|
101%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hynix HMA81GR7MFR8N-UH 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB RIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
81%
Excellent
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-1620 v3IntelBench 72%, 10,197 samples | 1,239x |
Xeon E5-1650 v3IntelBench 77%, 7,962 samples | 954x |
Xeon E5-1650 v4IntelBench 83%, 3,842 samples | 408x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples | 414x |
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples | 385x |
Quadro M2000NvidiaBench 21%, 5,678 samples | 286x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 27% - Poor | Total price: $80 |