Asrock FM2A68M-HD+

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	25.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock FM2A68M-HD+ (all builds)
Memory	9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160112
Uptime	8.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 25 '19 at 20:16
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	33%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-7860K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$175 12,658 User benchmarks, average bench 43% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	40.8% Average	Memory 52.8 1-Core 59.8 2-Core 84.8 41% 65.8 Pts	4-Core 168 8-Core 167 22% 167 Pts	64-Core 132 8% 132 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 3765) 2GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 431.36 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	25.6% Poor	Lighting 32 Reflection 23.2 Parallax 28.8 26% 28 fps	MRender 34.8 Gravity 29.5 Splatting 28 25% 30.7 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk S3512G 512GB 19,948 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: X6104000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 81 44 69 44 56 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	46.1% Average	Read 401 Write 189 Mixed 81.2 SusWrite 64.2 40% 184 MB/s	4K Read 21.5 4K Write 48.2 4K Mixed 17.1 80% 28.9 MB/s	DQ Read 29.8 DQ Write 69.9 DQ Mixed 27 27% 42.2 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 119%
Seagate ST2000NM0033 2TB 391 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 721GB free Firmware: NS00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 176 178 180 179 182 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 186 Write 174 Mixed 90.5 SusWrite 177 115% 157 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1.2 251% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	22.2% Poor	MC Read 9.2 MC Write 5 MC Mixed 9.6 23% 7.93 GB/s	SC Read 4.6 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 6.8 14% 4.83 GB/s	Latency 151 27% 151 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 22.2% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical FM2A68M-HD+ Builds (Compare 222 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A68M-HD+

CPU
A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples	38x
Athlon X4 845AMD $50Bench 45%, 6,391 samples	27x
A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 44%, 15,487 samples	23x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	32x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	19x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	16x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	14x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	5x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	8x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	7x
RipjawsX DDR3 2133 C11 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 6,575 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 11% - Very poor

Total price: $29

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16