| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 12.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Intel H61 (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 0 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit cores |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20181224 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 24 '19 at 14:27 |
| Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
| Run User | BRA-User |
| Background CPU | 12% |
PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
68.8%
Good
|
69% 116 Pts
|
36% 278 Pts
|
20% 331 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon HD 8800M
Sapphire(1DA2 E269) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.251.0.0
|
12.3%
Very poor
|
13% 17.2 fps
|
12% 14.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
447GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 95 107 105 101 96 MB/s
|
47.1%
Average
|
56% 76.4 MB/s
|
121% 0.8 MB/s
| |
|
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
2GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.7 8.9 9.2 9.2 8.8 9 MB/s
|
9.76%
Terrible
|
12% 10.6 MB/s
|
121% 2.4 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown SH564128FH8N6TNSQG 0194 SH564568FH8N0QHSCG 6GB
0, 0 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
|
49.4%
Average
|
48% 16.7 GB/s
|
42% 14.8 GB/s
|
62% 64.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H61 Builds (Compare 10,187 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Intel H61
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 1,966x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 998x |
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 989x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 2,007x |
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 1,354x |
| GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 706x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $87 |