Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	26.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Killer SLI (all builds)
Memory	26 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180110
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 24 '19 at 13:42
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$155 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	61.5% Good	Memory 61.5 1-Core 42.9 2-Core 169 49% 91 Pts	4-Core 330 8-Core 680 59% 505 Pts	64-Core 901 56% 901 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 85D6) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.36 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	26.2% Poor	Lighting 30.3 Reflection 28.4 Parallax 32.3 25% 30.3 fps	MRender 36.6 Gravity 35.3 Splatting 34.5 29% 35.5 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 26.2% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 7GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z33130RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 53 55 60 74 64 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	48.7% Average	Read 435 Write 115 Mixed 228 SusWrite 67.9 46% 211 MB/s	4K Read 15.7 4K Write 38.8 4K Mixed 14.9 63% 23.1 MB/s	DQ Read 163 DQ Write 197 DQ Mixed 17 58% 126 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 86%
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB 27,523 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 431GB free Firmware: SBFK61E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 47 58 54 52 71 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	16% Very poor	Read 122 Write 7.3 Mixed 80.5 SusWrite 54.5 15% 66.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 15.1 20% 5.37 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 91%
Toshiba MK3275GSX 320GB 4,670 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 132GB free Firmware: GT001M SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 20 24 23 21 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	9.76% Terrible	Read 14 Write 18 Mixed 15.5 SusWrite 20 12% 16.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.1 21% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 9.76% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D30BESBK.8FD 4x8GB 783 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	78.5% Very good	MC Read 31.9 MC Write 28.5 MC Mixed 27.9 84% 29.4 GB/s	SC Read 16.2 SC Write 19.4 SC Mixed 25.7 58% 20.4 GB/s	Latency 123 32% 123 ns
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 121%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 61%

Destroyer

Desktop 80%

Battleship

Workstation 60%

Gunboat

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	16x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	13x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	9x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	9x
PSD416G24002 2x16GBPatriotBench 79%, 353 samples	9x

Value: 111% - Outstanding

Total price: $465

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16