Asus CROSSHAIR VI HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics61.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive280% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus CROSSHAIR VI HERO  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 24 '19 at 12:40
Run Duration310 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Memory 85.9
1-Core 129
2-Core 245
86% 154 Pts
4-Core 453
8-Core 799
76% 626 Pts
64-Core 1,454
90% 1,454 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 390X-$340
CLim: 1080 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.7.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
61.3% Good
Lighting 76.3
Reflection 65
Parallax 95.8
62% 79 fps
MRender 64.8
Gravity 67.7
Splatting 81.3
60% 71.3 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 57%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
435GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2065 745 606 601 605 605 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
280% Outstanding
Read 2,487
Write 2307
Mixed 1,481
SusWrite 871
399% 1,787 MB/s
4K Read 62.8
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 83
278% 96.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,065
DQ Write 792
DQ Mixed 908
685% 922 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 280%
Great: 340%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
198GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 299 300 300 300 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 485
Write 471
Mixed 416
SusWrite 319
95% 423 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 57.8
194% 67.9 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 356
DQ Mixed 360
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 116%
Great: 124%
SanDisk Ultra 3D 500GB-$61
440GB free
Firmware: X61170RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 477 402 398 401 398 397 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 470
Mixed 389
SusWrite 412
99% 441 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 97
4K Mixed 48.5
170% 60.9 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 282
232% 330 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 113%
Great: 119%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
158GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1381 310 310 307 309 311 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 2,056
Write 1,529
Mixed 698
SusWrite 488
264% 1,193 MB/s
4K Read 42.3
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 59.7
220% 84.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,080
DQ Write 873
DQ Mixed 714
606% 889 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 223%
Great: 236%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
552GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 473 471 475 475 475 476 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 472
Mixed 457
SusWrite 474
107% 473 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 56.8
189% 66.5 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 361
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 124%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB-$73
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 43.8
MC Write 39.6
MC Mixed 32.5
110% 38.6 GB/s
SC Read 26.5
SC Write 39.4
SC Mixed 31.3
93% 32.4 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 107%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CROSSHAIR VI HERO Builds (Compare 1,745 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus CROSSHAIR VI HERO - $227

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $860
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback