| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 39% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 25.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | EVGA 132-CK-NF79 (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20091230 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 24 '19 at 07:26 |
| Run Duration | 133 Seconds |
| Run User | CAN-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Extreme X9650-$850
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
|
64.8%
Good
|
57% 87.7 Pts
|
29% 218 Pts
|
14% 219 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 1125 MHz, MLim: 1625 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.7.2
|
39%
Below average
|
39% 56 fps
|
39% 48.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 120GB-$32
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 18 14 19 20 15 MB/s
|
25.5%
Poor
|
22% 98.4 MB/s
|
56% 17.6 MB/s
|
5% 11.3 MB/s
|
|
Crucial_ CT960M50 960GB
256GB free
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 197 200 199 196 194 MB/s
|
52.3%
Above average
|
45% 198 MB/s
|
94% 33.3 MB/s
|
35% 52.6 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DRAM
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
24.3%
Poor
|
20% 7.03 GB/s
|
22% 7.57 GB/s
|
64% 62.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 132-CK-NF79 Builds (Compare 44 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: EVGA 132-CK-NF79
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Extreme X9770IntelBench 57%, 522 samples | 13x |
| Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 7x |
| Core2 Quad Q9450Intel $110Bench 49%, 5,335 samples | 6x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 8x |
| GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 4x |
| GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 54% - Above average | Total price: $228 |