Asus M51AC

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	6.37% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	95.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Asus M51AC (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK M51AC
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130927
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 24 '19 at 01:13
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$75 176,321 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	81.4% Excellent	Memory 91.8 1-Core 116 2-Core 230 83% 146 Pts	4-Core 383 8-Core 588 60% 485 Pts	64-Core 585 36% 585 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 81.4% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640 34,519 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 8597) ≥ 4GB CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 368.39 Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	6.37% Terrible	Lighting 7.57 Reflection 6.88 Parallax 7.91 6% 7.45 fps	MRender 7.86 Gravity 6.97 Splatting 9.43 7% 8.09 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.37% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$129 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 898GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 448 465 433 413 414 365 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	95.4% Outstanding	Read 319 Write 416 Mixed 377 SusWrite 423 87% 384 MB/s	4K Read 22.1 4K Write 62.2 4K Mixed 47.9 128% 44.1 MB/s	DQ Read 372 DQ Write 324 DQ Mixed 353 263% 350 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 95.4% Great: 133%
WD My Passport 0827 2TB 4,635 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1.5TB free, PID 0827 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 42 42 42 24 39 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	19.8% Very poor	Read 40.5 Write 37.8 Mixed 32.1 SusWrite 38.2 50% 37.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 19.8% Great: 43%
SanDisk USB Flash Drive 64GB 169 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 53GB free, PID 5584 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	11.4% Very poor	Read 31.7 Write 11.5 Mixed 14.5 SusWrite 11.8 20% 17.4 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 1.5 101% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.4% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 2x8GB 9,947 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	57.4% Above average	MC Read 20.3 MC Write 21.1 MC Mixed 17.1 56% 19.5 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 20.5 SC Mixed 18.1 53% 18.4 GB/s	Latency 64.3 62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M51AC Builds (Compare 626 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

System: Asus M51AC

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	385x
Core i7-4770SIntel $102Bench 71%, 13,157 samples	125x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	32x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	43x
GeForce GT 640NvidiaBench 6%, 34,519 samples	41x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	35x

SSD
MX500 1TBCrucial $86Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	15x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	14x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x

RAM
MI64C1D1629Z1 2x8GBAdataBench 54%, 2,816 samples	78x
MI64C1D1629Z1 1x8GBAdataBench 31%, 1,606 samples	36x
AO2L16BC8R2-BR2S 2x8GBUnknownBench 56%, 671 samples	36x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 83% - Excellent

Total price: $220

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16