| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 0.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 31.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | HP 2000 Notebook PC (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 3577 |
| Memory | 1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20111213 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 23 '19 at 23:55 |
| Run Duration | 144 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 43% |
PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD E-350
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
|
31.1%
Below average
|
28% 38.1 Pts
|
5% 38.7 Pts
|
2% 39.6 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon HD 6310
HP(103C 3577) 384MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
|
0.87%
Terrible
|
1% 1.18 fps
|
1% 1.11 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Plextor PX-128S2C 128GB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 83 107 113 91 107 MB/s
|
31.3%
Below average
|
39% 176 MB/s
|
26% 8.3 MB/s
|
42% 58.5 MB/s
|
|
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 64GB-$7
56GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 MB/s
|
1.62%
Terrible
|
1% 0.62 MB/s
|
29% 0.43 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Micron 16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
13%
Very poor
|
13% 4.4 GB/s
|
6% 2.07 GB/s
|
29% 140 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 2000 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 624 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP 2000 Notebook PC
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples | 126x |
| E-300 APUAMD $120Bench 23%, 7,672 samples | 83x |
| Core i3-2328MIntelBench 47%, 7,778 samples | 47x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples | 206x |
| Radeon HD 6310AMDBench 1%, 13,166 samples | 91x |
| HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples | 82x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 56% - Above average | Total price: $98 |