Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	28.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840x2160x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190617
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 23 '19 at 21:35
Run Duration	179 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185 123,820 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	76.5% Very good	Memory 76.3 1-Core 107 2-Core 215 74% 133 Pts	4-Core 411 8-Core 854 74% 632 Pts	64-Core 1,128 70% 1,128 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% MSI(1462 3602) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.86 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.7% Poor	Lighting 19.9 Reflection 23 Parallax 106 16% 49.7 fps	MRender 28.5 Gravity 19.9 Splatting 121 53% 56.4 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0B 500GB 11,733 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 289GB free (System drive) Firmware: X61190WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 379 368 392 403 400 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 504 Write 449 Mixed 248 SusWrite 382 89% 396 MB/s	4K Read 36.2 4K Write 82.7 4K Mixed 46.4 158% 55.1 MB/s	DQ Read 264 DQ Write 265 DQ Mixed 221 178% 250 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 115%
WDC WDS500G2B0A 500GB 24,830 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 216GB free Firmware: X61190WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 402 394 394 398 398 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	77.7% Very good	Read 401 Write 438 Mixed 259 SusWrite 401 84% 375 MB/s	4K Read 31 4K Write 60.8 4K Mixed 22.3 108% 38 MB/s	DQ Read 163 DQ Write 65.4 DQ Mixed 53.3 56% 93.8 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 77.7% Great: 119%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 130GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 89 75 90 89 90 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	67.6% Good	Read 148 Write 120 Mixed 87.7 SusWrite 87.3 82% 111 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.2 238% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 109%
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB 14,138 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 2.5TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 237 232 237 233 236 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 76% Great: 136%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9 17,023 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 35GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	10.1% Very poor	Read 36.7 Write 6 Mixed 9 SusWrite 6.4 15% 14.5 MB/s	4K Read 7.7 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.9 76% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 10.1% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB 31,785 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	MC Read 42.4 MC Write 39.7 MC Mixed 38.2 114% 40.1 GB/s	SC Read 22.6 SC Write 36.1 SC Mixed 32.3 87% 30.3 GB/s	Latency 87.8 46% 87.8 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 119%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,857 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 80%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	1,436x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	306x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	281x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	234x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	232x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	202x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	189x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	188x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	177x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	202x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	142x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	134x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $1,013

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)