Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 51% Yacht	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 47% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	48.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	238% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	22.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180626
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 23 '19 at 19:30
Run Duration	251 Seconds
Run User	CHN-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103 50,196 User benchmarks, average bench 81% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	87.3% Excellent	Memory 96.1 1-Core 118 2-Core 235 85% 149 Pts	4-Core 423 8-Core 750 71% 587 Pts	64-Core 976 60% 976 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 87.3% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Asus(1043 8593) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.36 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48.3% Average	Lighting 54.6 Reflection 63 Parallax 51.1 44% 56.3 fps	MRender 77.8 Gravity 54.5 Splatting 71 56% 67.8 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 21,747 User benchmarks, average bench 219% 140GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXZ7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 952 880 842 823 802 795 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	238% Outstanding	Read 1909 Write 824 Mixed 542 SusWrite 849 227% 1,031 MB/s	4K Read 45.7 4K Write 144 4K Mixed 64.9 229% 84.9 MB/s	DQ Read 947 DQ Write 795 DQ Mixed 440 447% 727 MB/s
Poor: 134% ↑ This bench: 238% Great: 292%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 75GB free Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 131 129 130 129 130 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	96.3% Outstanding	Read 456 Write 453 Mixed 298 SusWrite 157 76% 341 MB/s	4K Read 41.2 4K Write 92.2 4K Mixed 46.5 171% 60 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 337 DQ Mixed 174 181% 296 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 96.3% Great: 108%
HS-SSD-C2000 1TB 168 User benchmarks, average bench 228% 782GB free Firmware: ECFM12.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1495 996 931 997 990 992 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	234% Outstanding	Read 1,772 Write 2,122 Mixed 615 SusWrite 1,067 312% 1,394 MB/s	4K Read 31.8 4K Write 139 4K Mixed 49.4 185% 73.4 MB/s	DQ Read 978 DQ Write 880 DQ Mixed 977 720% 945 MB/s
Poor: 155% ↑ This bench: 234% Great: 282%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$174 9,888 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2TB free Firmware: 81.H0A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 184 181 185 188 180 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 176 Write 177 Mixed 74 SusWrite 184 111% 153 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 5.7 4K Mixed 0.5 203% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 113%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 3.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 165 170 172 172 171 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	99.1% Outstanding	Read 175 Write 155 Mixed 112 SusWrite 170 113% 153 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1.1 215% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 99.1% Great: 101%
Seagate ST2000DX001 2TB 135 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 407GB free Firmware: ZZZZ SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 128 131 130 130 130 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	90.3% Outstanding	Read 184 Write 141 Mixed 62.2 SusWrite 130 94% 129 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 2.5 425% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 90.3% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB 3,365 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	142% Outstanding	MC Read 50.3 MC Write 66.8 MC Mixed 52.6 162% 56.6 GB/s	SC Read 15.8 SC Write 20.8 SC Mixed 20.1 54% 18.9 GB/s	Latency 53.7 74% 53.7 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 142% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-E WS/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 261 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 102%

UFO

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 98%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

CPU
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	38x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	28x
Core i7-6900KIntel $120Bench 86%, 6,755 samples	23x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	31x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	27x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	21x

SSD
SSDSC2BB150G7 150GBIntelBench 52%, 328 samples	20x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	11x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	10x

RAM
M393A1K43DB2-CWE 8x8GBSamsungBench 146%, 50 samples	6x
SP008GXLZU320BSA 4x8GBSilicon-PowerBench 99%, 50 samples	6x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 4x16GBSamsungBench 92%, 1,230 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $770

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16