Biostar H81MGV3

Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	51.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Biostar H81MGV3 (all builds)
Memory	10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20141216
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 23 '19 at 13:57
Run Duration	242 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348 455,746 User benchmarks, average bench 79% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	84.4% Excellent	Memory 93 1-Core 119 2-Core 238 85% 150 Pts	4-Core 416 8-Core 553 62% 485 Pts	64-Core 613 38% 613 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 84.4% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	51.5% Above average	Lighting 64.4 Reflection 65.9 Parallax 59.3 52% 63.2 fps	MRender 70.1 Gravity 60.8 Splatting 53.6 50% 61.5 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 206GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 262 176 169 77 71 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 456 Write 421 Mixed 399 SusWrite 181 82% 364 MB/s	4K Read 44.1 4K Write 124 4K Mixed 63.6 214% 77.2 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 346 DQ Mixed 357 269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 134%
WD WD20EURS-63S48Y0 2TB 12,928 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 137 140 145 139 144 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	78.9% Very good	Read 136 Write 134 Mixed 79.3 SusWrite 139 89% 122 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 0.9 194% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 77%
WD Elements 25A3 6TB 4,829 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 1TB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 7.7 7.6 7.8 7.8 7.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	13% Very poor	Read 26 Write 25.3 Mixed 23.8 SusWrite 7.7 27% 20.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 119% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 13% Great: 107%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB 1,841 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1.5TB free, PID ab38 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.4 7.4 7.2 7.4 7.5 7.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	16.9% Very poor	Read 20.2 Write 20.7 Mixed 19.8 SusWrite 7.4 23% 17 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 0.5 155% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 75%
WD Elements 25A3 5TB 1,735 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 326GB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 7.8 7.7 7.8 7.8 7.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	13.8% Very poor	Read 26.8 Write 26 Mixed 23.5 SusWrite 7.8 28% 21 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 126% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 13.8% Great: 66%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB 1,841 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2TB free, PID ab38 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 7.4 7.3 7.5 7.5 7.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	16.4% Very poor	Read 20.8 Write 22.3 Mixed 20.2 SusWrite 7.4 24% 17.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 0.6 152% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 75%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1TB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 7.8 7.7 7.8 7.8 8.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	13.6% Very poor	Read 26 Write 26.2 Mixed 24.7 SusWrite 7.9 28% 21.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.7 114% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	57.6% Above average	MC Read 20.8 MC Write 20.8 MC Mixed 17 56% 19.5 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 20.9 SC Mixed 18.9 52% 18.4 GB/s	Latency 62.2 64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81MGV3 Builds (Compare 99 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Biostar H81MGV3

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	20x
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	17x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	9x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	13x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	12x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	8x

SSD
HG5d Q Series 256GBToshiba $225Bench 82%, 3,223 samples	6x
Z400s 256GBSanDisk $221Bench 72%, 10,770 samples	5x
60G 60GBWalramBench 61%, 7 samples	3x

RAM
CL11-11-11 D3-1600 2x8GBUnknownBench 54%, 2,124 samples	7x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	6x
M2F8G64CC8HD5N-DI 2x8GBNanyaBench 49%, 1,126 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $560

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $48	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16