Toshiba SATELLITE C50D-B

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 33% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	50.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE C50D-B (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA ZBWAE
Memory	1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150727
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 23 '19 at 01:27
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	91%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-6210 APU R3 Graphics 5,378 User benchmarks, average bench 30% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	34.2% Below average	Memory 51.3 1-Core 26.8 2-Core 54.7 29% 44.3 Pts	4-Core 101 8-Core 102 14% 102 Pts	64-Core 93.3 6% 93.3 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R3 Graphics 6,021 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Toshiba(1179 F910) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.6.3 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	1.79% Terrible	Lighting 2 Reflection 4.08 Parallax 2.72 2% 2.93 fps	MRender 2.67 Gravity 1.9 Splatting 3 2% 2.52 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.79% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingchuxing 120GB 120GB 68 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 76GB free (System drive) Firmware: T180509 SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 25 37 31 40 40 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	50.4% Above average	Read 344 Write 187 Mixed 317 SusWrite 36.5 49% 221 MB/s	4K Read 26 4K Write 39.5 4K Mixed 26.9 95% 30.8 MB/s	DQ Read 93.6 DQ Write 133 DQ Mixed 65.6 63% 97.5 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 90%
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40 42,694 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 546GB free Firmware: AX1P4M SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 65 64 65 66 65 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	45.3% Average	Read 92.9 Write 96.7 Mixed 31.9 SusWrite 64.9 52% 71.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 94% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GB 50,921 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	16.3% Very poor	MC Read 6.9 MC Write 3.9 MC Mixed 5.6 16% 5.47 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 3.5 SC Mixed 5 12% 4.27 GB/s	Latency 156 26% 156 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SATELLITE C50D-B Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 24%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C50D-B

CPU
E1-6010 APU R2 GraphicsAMDBench 22%, 1,618 samples	9x
A4-6210 APU R3 GraphicsAMDBench 30%, 5,378 samples	9x
A8-6410 APU R5 GraphicsAMDBench 32%, 19,683 samples	4x

GPU
Radeon R3 GraphicsAMDBench 2%, 6,021 samples	9x
Radeon R2 GraphicsAMDBench 1%, 7,644 samples	9x
Radeon R5AMDBench 2%, 40,685 samples	4x

SSD
SSD Plus 240GBSanDisk $28Bench 61%, 133,640 samples	1x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	1x
Fury 120GBHyperX $160Bench 64%, 11,403 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 38,580 samples	7x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	4x
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 40,451 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 20% - Very poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16