Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	30.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	66.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E31220-$305 2,507 User benchmarks, average bench 68% LGA1155 CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	73.4% Very good	Memory 91.2 1-Core 87.8 2-Core 173 70% 117 Pts	4-Core 323 8-Core 320 43% 322 Pts	64-Core 322 20% 322 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.17 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	30.8% Below average	Lighting 38.3 Reflection 29.9 Parallax 36.5 31% 34.9 fps	MRender 38.2 Gravity 37.6 Splatting 35.1 30% 37 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 170GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 190 203 199 203 204 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	66.3% Good	Read 297 Write 219 Mixed 224 SusWrite 198 53% 235 MB/s	4K Read 30.4 4K Write 43.7 4K Mixed 35.7 115% 36.6 MB/s	DQ Read 158 DQ Write 122 DQ Mixed 136 103% 139 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 66.3% Great: 124%
Samsung HD642JJ 640GB-$70 13,060 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 566GB free Firmware: 1AA01117 SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 22 22 21 22 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	12.1% Very poor	Read 20.3 Write 18.1 Mixed 18.9 SusWrite 21.7 15% 19.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.2 42% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 2x8GB 4,871 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	52.3% Above average	MC Read 18 MC Write 19.1 MC Mixed 16.6 51% 17.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 15.5 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 65.5 61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,139x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,040x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	821x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	455x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	424x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16