PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 33.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 34.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-PH67-UD3-B3 (all builds) |
Memory | 8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1842 x 1036 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120321 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jul 22 '19 at 23:32 |
Run Duration | 221 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 4% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-2600-$195
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
|
71.8%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.36
|
33.6%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 5.2 22 2.2 42 3.2 MB/s
|
34.1%
Below average
|
|||
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
121GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 114 115 110 116 116 MB/s
|
56.3%
Above average
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
258GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 79 83 90 93 88 MB/s
|
65.4%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB
212GB free
Firmware: 0739
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.7 8.9 8.9 8.9 9 9.1 MB/s
|
5.72%
Terrible
|
|||
WD Elements 2TB
1TB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 28 29 29 29 29 MB/s
|
17.2%
Very poor
|
|||
WD Elements 25A3 4TB
2TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 8 8.3 8.3 8.2 9.2 MB/s
|
14.4%
Very poor
|
|||
Seagate Desktop 2TB
534GB free, PID 3300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 8.3 8.4 8.3 8.3 8.3 MB/s
|
7.66%
Terrible
|
|||
WD A DT01A External 1TB
454GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.7 8.4 8.4 8.3 8.3 8.3 MB/s
|
10.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Seagate Desktop 1TB
69GB free, PID 3300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 8.4 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.3 MB/s
|
11.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 12GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 4096, 4096 MB
|
30.7%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 10x |
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 9x |
Core i7-2600Intel $195Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 9x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 6x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 5x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 73% - Very good | Total price: $380 |