| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 8.66% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 80.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (83%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Micro-Star MS-7B84 |
| Motherboard | MSI A320M PRO-M2 V2 (MS-7B84) (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190130 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 22 '19 at 23:29 |
| Run Duration | 112 Seconds |
| Run User | CAN-User |
| Background CPU | 83% |
PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
78.4%
Very good
|
74% 131 Pts
|
72% 596 Pts
|
72% 1,155 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 560-$500
CLim: 1196 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.1.1
|
8.66%
Terrible
|
0% 22.1 fps
|
25% 30.6 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 120GB-$32
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 66 64 66 64 66 MB/s
|
80.6%
Excellent
|
69% 310 MB/s
|
144% 52.2 MB/s
|
163% 244 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 9905702-017.A00G 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
|
82.2%
Excellent
|
84% 29.4 GB/s
|
74% 26 GB/s
|
47% 84.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A320M PRO-M2 V2 (MS-7B84) Builds (Compare 574 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: MSI A320M PRO-M2 V2 (MS-7B84)
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 121x |
| Ryzen 3 2300X Quad-CoreAMDBench 71%, 10,689 samples | 75x |
| Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 67x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 89x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 29x |
| RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 29x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $255 |