Asus H87M-E

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	26.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus H87M-E (all builds)
Memory	10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150618
Uptime	9.4 Days
Run Date	Jul 22 '19 at 19:30
Run Duration	188 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4330-$140 6,343 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	68.6% Good	Memory 92.1 1-Core 88.3 2-Core 175 71% 119 Pts	4-Core 264 8-Core 265 35% 264 Pts	64-Core 262 16% 262 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 68.6% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 372D) CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 431.36 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	26.9% Poor	Lighting 33.2 Reflection 24.2 Parallax 29.8 27% 29.1 fps	MRender 37 Gravity 31.3 Splatting 30.3 27% 32.9 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 26.9% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 302 293 265 224 251 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	114% Outstanding	Read 499 Write 482 Mixed 397 SusWrite 284 93% 416 MB/s	4K Read 42.1 4K Write 110 4K Mixed 57.5 196% 69.8 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 345 DQ Mixed 353 268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 124%
WD Green 1.5TB (2011)-$51 6,566 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 775GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 106 106 106 105 106 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	60.4% Good	Read 105 Write 92 Mixed 90.3 SusWrite 106 73% 98.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 125% 1 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 65%
Samsung HD642JJ 640GB-$70 13,060 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 133GB free Firmware: 1AA01118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 52 52 54 53 53 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	33.2% Below average	Read 62.5 Write 35 Mixed 40 SusWrite 52.8 35% 47.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 63%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40 43,024 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 3GB free Firmware: CR100-10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 39 66 58 40 39 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	33.2% Below average	Read 68.3 Write 32.3 Mixed 30 SusWrite 47.1 33% 44.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 44%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 33GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 96 96 98 96 97 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	56% Above average	Read 98.5 Write 97.5 Mixed 32 SusWrite 96.3 59% 81.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 146% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 108%
Seagate ST3500820AS 1TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 26GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 83 83 83 85 83 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 81.3 Write 74.7 Mixed 65 SusWrite 83 56% 76 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 182% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 67% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x4GB 3,428 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	57.9% Above average	MC Read 19 MC Write 22.1 MC Mixed 18.5 57% 19.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.4 SC Write 18.7 SC Mixed 19 51% 17.7 GB/s	Latency 63.9 63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87M-E Builds (Compare 854 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87M-E - $129

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	196x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	128x
Core i5-4440Intel $128Bench 61%, 81,111 samples	76x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	87x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	45x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	40x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	44x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	25x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	24x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	35x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	25x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $247

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16