Asus M5A99X EVO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111024
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 22 '19 at 14:51
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User MDA-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$175
AM3r2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Memory 82.9
1-Core 65.3
2-Core 121
56% 89.7 Pts
4-Core 152
8-Core 212
23% 182 Pts
64-Core 349
22% 349 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 182
Parallax 244
111% 187 fps
MRender 263
Gravity 218
Splatting 147
164% 209 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 123%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
257GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 170 169 169 170 169 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Read 141
Write 146
Mixed 91
SusWrite 169
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
232% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 109%
WD WD10EADX-00TDHB0 1TB
89GB free
Firmware: 77.04D77
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 52 52 53 51 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 60.7
Write 58.2
Mixed 52.2
SusWrite 52.3
42% 55.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 57%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 87 74 77 90 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 93.2
Write 108
Mixed 44.5
SusWrite 80.3
60% 81.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.2
191% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
47.5% Average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 16.9
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 13.2
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO Builds (Compare 322 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $517
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback