| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 27.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asrock Z68 Pro3-M (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20110427 |
| Uptime | 8.8 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 22 '19 at 14:35 |
| Run Duration | 137 Seconds |
| Run User | SWE-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
|
79.1%
Very good
|
74% 124 Pts
|
50% 364 Pts
|
24% 381 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.64
|
27.7%
Poor
|
28% 32.1 fps
|
27% 33.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
14% 64.6 MB/s
|
31% 9.57 MB/s
|
9% 12.1 MB/s
| |
|
Samsung HD251HJ 250GB-$39
41GB free
Firmware: 1AC01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 80 62 67 82 83 MB/s
|
45.5%
Average
|
54% 74 MB/s
|
181% 1.3 MB/s
| |
|
WD WD25 00JS-58NCB1 250GB
97GB free
Firmware: 10.02E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 62 62 62 62 62 MB/s
|
34.4%
Below average
|
41% 55.1 MB/s
|
175% 1.23 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 9905403-437.A01LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
53.3%
Above average
|
52% 18 GB/s
|
46% 16.2 GB/s
|
66% 60.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Z68 Pro3-M Builds (Compare 146 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock Z68 Pro3-M
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 46x |
| Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 28x |
| Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 17x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 13x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 8x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 8x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 78% - Very good | Total price: $306 |