Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	22.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J3060 2,183 User benchmarks, average bench 22% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	25.2% Poor	Memory 43.2 1-Core 24.5 2-Core 44.6 25% 37.4 Pts	4-Core 44 8-Core 44.2 6% 44.1 Pts	64-Core 40.3 2% 40.3 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 25.2% Great: 28%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2060) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	1.63% Terrible	Lighting 1.83 Reflection 2.08 Parallax 2.75 2% 2.22 fps	MRender 2.48 Gravity 1.93 Splatting 2.48 2% 2.3 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.63% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK71E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 43 13 37 51 44 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	22.5% Poor	Read 200 Write 96.7 Mixed 71.5 SusWrite 67.4 24% 109 MB/s	4K Read 8 4K Write 15.2 4K Mixed 8 30% 10.4 MB/s	DQ Read 20.8 DQ Write 25.2 DQ Mixed 22.6 17% 22.9 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 22.5% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5428-018.A00LF 1x8GB 6,120 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12% Very poor	MC Read 4.4 MC Write 4.1 MC Mixed 3.4 11% 3.97 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 1.9 9% 3 GB/s	Latency 188 21% 188 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,139x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,040x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	821x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	455x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	424x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16