Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive268% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming  (all builds)
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190322
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 22 '19 at 10:06
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Memory 93.6
1-Core 136
2-Core 265
92% 165 Pts
4-Core 491
8-Core 835
80% 663 Pts
64-Core 1,064
66% 1,064 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2808 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
125% Outstanding
Lighting 171
Reflection 191
Parallax 171
140% 178 fps
MRender 125
Gravity 173
Splatting 124
114% 140 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 125%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 895 578 575 570 582 602 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
268% Outstanding
Read 2475
Write 2,263
Mixed 1,550
SusWrite 634
386% 1,731 MB/s
4K Read 62.5
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 82.3
277% 96.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,124
DQ Write 846
DQ Mixed 1,007
747% 993 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 268%
Great: 340%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
78GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,955
Write 1,406
Mixed 700
298% 1,354 MB/s
4K Read 46
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 54.8
229% 89.6 MB/s
DQ Read 894
DQ Write 796
DQ Mixed 652
542% 781 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
WD Red 8TB (2016)-$180
3TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 150 141 145 148 144 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Read 136
Write 133
Mixed 67
SusWrite 144
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.2
216% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 97%
WD Blue SSHD 4TB (2015)-$65
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 144 142 146 142 145 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Read 150
Write 75.5
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 144
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
114% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 83%
Seagate ST8000DM0004-1ZC11G 8TB
4TB free
Firmware: DN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 194 196 196 195 197 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 36% Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.9% Good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 20.2
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 20.9
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 60.7
66% 60.7 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 3,019 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $844
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback