Gigabyte GA-B360N WIFI-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	28.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	212% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte B360N WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-B360N WIFI-CF (all builds)
Memory	5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180713
Uptime	7.6 Days
Run Date	Jul 22 '19 at 06:17
Run Duration	255 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-8100-$110 81,392 User benchmarks, average bench 71% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	86.1% Excellent	Memory 92.8 1-Core 116 2-Core 233 84% 147 Pts	4-Core 458 8-Core 466 62% 462 Pts	64-Core 457 28% 457 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 86.1% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Zotac(19DA 2454) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.16 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	28.6% Poor	Lighting 35.5 Reflection 26.2 Parallax 32.2 29% 31.3 fps	MRender 38 Gravity 33 Splatting 32.4 28% 34.5 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 145GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 506 311 305 313 317 317 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	212% Outstanding	Read 1,685 Write 1,468 Mixed 766 SusWrite 345 237% 1066 MB/s	4K Read 55.9 4K Write 119 4K Mixed 71.9 240% 82.3 MB/s	DQ Read 964 DQ Write 1,227 DQ Mixed 1,014 788% 1,068 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 212% Great: 280%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 748GB 450 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 304GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 63 63 64 64 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	38.1% Below average	Read 69.8 Write 44.9 Mixed 48.1 SusWrite 62.6 42% 56.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston X5H5PW-MIB 1x8GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	43.2% Average	MC Read 16.7 MC Write 16 MC Mixed 11.8 42% 14.8 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 11.2 SC Mixed 9.9 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 62.4 64% 62.4 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-B360N WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 430 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B360N WIFI-CF

CPU
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	71x
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	63x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	49x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)IntelBench 5%, 147,588 samples	41x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	28x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	24x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	19x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	17x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	15x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	27x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	20x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $253

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16