Asrock X570 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 107% UFO	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 120% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock X570 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190710
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 21 '19 at 22:01
Run Duration	122 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	98.8% Outstanding	Memory 85.6 1-Core 147 2-Core 301 96% 178 Pts	4-Core 599 8-Core 1,186 105% 892 Pts	64-Core 2,162 134% 2,162 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 98.8% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% PNY(196E 119E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 418.81 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	105% Outstanding	Lighting 136 Reflection 146 Parallax 127 111% 136 fps	MRender 115 Gravity 132 Splatting 109 96% 118 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 246GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 381 317 317 317 317 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 509 Write 453 Mixed 455 SusWrite 350 99% 442 MB/s	4K Read 40.7 4K Write 96.1 4K Mixed 55.1 183% 64 MB/s	DQ Read 225 DQ Write 190 DQ Mixed 205 154% 207 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2TB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 171 171 172 171 170 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	97.3% Outstanding	Read 168 Write 121 Mixed 76.3 SusWrite 171 98% 134 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 97.3% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS16G4D32AESE.M16FE 2x16GB 4,242 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3266 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	MC Read 45.8 MC Write 39.5 MC Mixed 41.5 121% 42.3 GB/s	SC Read 26.5 SC Write 23.9 SC Mixed 38.3 84% 29.6 GB/s	Latency 71.5 56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 129%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X570 Taichi Builds (Compare 2,200 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 164%

UFO

Desktop 95%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 187%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Taichi - $213

CPU
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	398x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	381x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	333x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	271x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,306Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	151x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	144x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	171x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	115x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	71x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	121x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 106%, 11,505 samples	67x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GBG.SKILLBench 110%, 12,538 samples	38x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $1,613

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16