Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	32.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	198% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	83.7% Excellent	Memory 90.4 1-Core 123 2-Core 249 86% 154 Pts	4-Core 414 8-Core 720 69% 567 Pts	64-Core 837 52% 837 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 83.7% Great: 86%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel UHD Graphics 630 506,702 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Legend(17AA 39FD) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6292 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	6.7% Terrible	Lighting 7.27 Reflection 10.5 Parallax 7.28 6% 8.36 fps	MRender 7.19 Gravity 6.6 Splatting 14.3 8% 9.38 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.7% Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile) 105,856 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Legend(17AA 39FD) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.36 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	32.2% Below average	Lighting 40.6 Reflection 29.3 Parallax 36.8 33% 35.6 fps	MRender 37.4 Gravity 39.6 Splatting 35 30% 37.4 fps
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 31%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$69 12,601 User benchmarks, average bench 205% 385GB free (System drive) Firmware: BXW7300Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 744 623 657 634 632 558 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	198% Outstanding	Read 1,528 Write 1,020 Mixed 734 SusWrite 641 218% 981 MB/s	4K Read 45.7 4K Write 113 4K Mixed 59.2 205% 72.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1,184 DQ Write 359 DQ Mixed 548 463% 697 MB/s
Poor: 136% ↑ This bench: 198% Great: 262%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB 145,911 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 95GB free Firmware: LXM3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 80 89 90 89 90 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	44.6% Average	Read 67.3 Write 113 Mixed 54 SusWrite 88 59% 80.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.3 88% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 95%
WD easystore 25FA 4TB 7,384 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2.5TB free, PID 25fa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 62 63 63 63 63 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	45.7% Average	Read 57.2 Write 57.7 Mixed 47.8 SusWrite 62.7 77% 56.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 7.7 4K Mixed 0.6 284% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GB 96,646 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	43.3% Average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 14.6 MC Mixed 11.6 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 13.6 SC Mixed 12.8 38% 13.2 GB/s	Latency 66.7 60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	2,156x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	1,910x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	2,090x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples	1,057x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	919x

SSD
RPFTJ128PDD2EWX 128GBBench 68%, 9,061 samples	386x
TOSHIBA 128GBKbg30zmt128gBench 83%, 5,624 samples	265x
MZVLB256HAHQ-000L2 256GBSamsungBench 180%, 5,016 samples	182x

RAM
RMSA3260MD78HAF-2666 1x8GBRamaxelBench 39%, 6,442 samples	582x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	409x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	296x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16