Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics95% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory29.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190617
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 21 '19 at 21:18
Run Duration260 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 79.3
1-Core 86.4
2-Core 171
65% 112 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 649
59% 494 Pts
64-Core 944
58% 944 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324
Asus(1043 868B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
95% Outstanding
Lighting 122
Reflection 118
Parallax 111
99% 117 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 104
Splatting 84
87% 110 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 95%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2375
Write 2219
Mixed 1,535
454% 2,043 MB/s
4K Read 54.6
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 70.6
231% 78.3 MB/s
DQ Read 735
DQ Write 510
DQ Mixed 682
493% 642 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66
538GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 465 463 466 451 428 426 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 469
Mixed 425
SusWrite 450
104% 463 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 92.4
4K Mixed 50.7
170% 60 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 309
250% 353 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 117%
Great: 125%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
229GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 295 294 294 294 293 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 487
Mixed 382
SusWrite 314
95% 421 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 96.2
4K Mixed 55.8
188% 65 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 370
278% 372 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 114%
Great: 124%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66
751GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 464 462 452 417 423 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 466
Mixed 433
SusWrite 447
104% 462 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 81.9
4K Mixed 48.7
158% 55 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 310
250% 351 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 113%
Great: 125%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 150 153 155 156 155 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 163
Mixed 23.1
SusWrite 154
92% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
173% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 107%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 64GB-$7
52GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 37 29 25 20 26 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
39% Below average
Read 166
Write 62
Mixed 61.6
SusWrite 33
90% 80.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.9
158% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 39%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3066 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 42.3
MC Write 38.8
MC Mixed 36.4
112% 39.2 GB/s
SC Read 23.9
SC Write 38.5
SC Mixed 30.8
89% 31.1 GB/s
Latency 81.8
49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 107%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,435 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $578
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback