Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.52% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	35.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2650 0 1,371 User benchmarks, average bench 60% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	66% Good	Memory 83.4 1-Core 72.6 2-Core 118 58% 91.3 Pts	4-Core 263 8-Core 507 46% 385 Pts	64-Core 634 39% 634 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 66% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000 15,855 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Nvidia(10DE 084A) 1GB CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 353.62 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	6.52% Terrible	Lighting 7.6 Reflection 8.88 Parallax 6.31 6% 7.6 fps	MRender 9.9 Gravity 8.03 Splatting 8.43 7% 8.79 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.52% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
FTM24N325H 240GB 458 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 170GB free (System drive) Firmware: 8B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 253 118 47 159 106 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	35.2% Below average	Read 422 Write 375 Mixed 12.4 SusWrite 154 53% 241 MB/s	4K Read 19.6 4K Write 6.3 4K Mixed 0.4 34% 8.77 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 89%
MB2000GCWLT 2TB 396 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2TB free Firmware: HPG3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 162 162 162 163 162 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	92.6% Outstanding	Read 161 Write 164 Mixed 92.4 SusWrite 162 106% 145 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.8 177% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 92.6% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix-00AD HMT31GR7BFR4A-H9 4x8GB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	81.4% Excellent	MC Read 34.5 MC Write 31.6 MC Mixed 30 92% 32 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 9.9 32% 11.1 GB/s	Latency 74.5 54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 81.4% Great: 87%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

RAM
M393B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsung-00CEBench 85%, 1,049 samples	147x
HMT351R7CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynix-00ADBench 83%, 808 samples	130x
HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB 4x8GBHynix-00ADBench 78%, 761 samples	74x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16