MSI MS-16JB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive272% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemMicro-Star GL62MVR 7RFX
MotherboardMSI MS-16JB  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 21 '19 at 14:21
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU9%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Memory 89.7
1-Core 85.7
2-Core 203
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 399
8-Core 399
53% 399 Pts
64-Core 403
25% 403 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 11D5) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3136
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
51.3% Above average
Lighting 62.4
Reflection 69.2
Parallax 57.4
51% 63 fps
MRender 67.4
Gravity 56.9
Splatting 66.6
52% 63.6 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
296GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1080 1288 517 267 277 286 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
272% Outstanding
Read 2,182
Write 1,713
Mixed 1,119
SusWrite 619
313% 1,408 MB/s
4K Read 66.6
4K Write 163
4K Mixed 91.9
305% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1,263
DQ Write 1,075
DQ Mixed 1,167
875% 1,168 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 272%
Great: 355%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
890GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3U0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 117 117 121 120 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 117
Write 110
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 119
66% 92 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
110% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 75%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
73GB free, PID 0100
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 51 51 51 54 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
23.4% Poor
Read 52
Write 50.7
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 51.2
60% 44.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 44%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
12GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 3.6 3.2 4.4 4 4.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
7.1% Terrible
Read 21
Write 5.2
Mixed 12
SusWrite 4.3
12% 10.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 2.4
121% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.1%
Great: 18%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
149GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 93 94 92 92 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 54.7
Write 55.9
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 92.6
80% 57.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
43.6% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 12.4
42% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 13.7
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16JB Builds (Compare 1,701 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI MS-16JB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback