Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics55% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Pro3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140605
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 21 '19 at 14:03
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Memory 79
1-Core 48.5
2-Core 96.6
48% 74.7 Pts
4-Core 185
8-Core 273
28% 229 Pts
64-Core 271
17% 271 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
55% Above average
Lighting 67.3
Reflection 68
Parallax 65.5
55% 66.9 fps
MRender 70.4
Gravity 66.5
Splatting 66.7
55% 67.8 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 456
Write 406
Mixed 300
86% 387 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 70.3
4K Mixed 42.2
147% 49.8 MB/s
DQ Read 259
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 146
136% 212 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
61GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 141 152 154 154 154 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 335
Write 301
Mixed 234
SusWrite 151
57% 255 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 60.3
4K Mixed 33.7
117% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 33.2
DQ Write 98.2
DQ Mixed 41.4
39% 57.6 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 110%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$170
1TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 101 104 104 106 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 118
Write 107
Mixed 66.7
SusWrite 105
73% 99.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 63%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31
723GB free
Firmware: CC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 141 152 154 154 154 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 150
Write 120
Mixed 79.5
SusWrite 151
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
173% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 86%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLT4G3D1869DT1TX0. 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.3% Poor
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 10.4
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 7.6
18% 6.17 GB/s
Latency 82.3
49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Pro3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 787 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0 - $18

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $152
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback