PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 28% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 99.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P (all builds) |
Memory | 26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.9 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kleuren |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20160226 |
Uptime | 0.7 Days |
Run Date | Jul 21 '19 at 09:43 |
Run Duration | 170 Seconds |
Run User | BEL-User |
Background CPU | 21% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
63.2%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.36
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
322GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 365 340 328 325 318 MB/s
|
99.7%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 120 121 123 120 124 MB/s
|
71%
Very good
|
|||
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
191GB free
Firmware: 1AA01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 60 61 61 62 MB/s
|
39.4%
Below average
|
|||
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100
942GB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 137 140 137 139 138 MB/s
|
79.1%
Very good
|
|||
WD Elements 25A3 4TB
2TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s
|
23.7%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 933 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
47%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 940x |
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 854x |
FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 395x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 279x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 180x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 159x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $366 |