Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180312
Uptime	4.4 Days
Run Date	Jul 21 '19 at 09:13
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570 104,858 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	79.4% Very good	Memory 92.7 1-Core 108 2-Core 214 80% 138 Pts	4-Core 374 8-Core 427 52% 400 Pts	64-Core 418 26% 418 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 79.4% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152 36,698 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Gigabyte(1458 3618) 2GB CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.67 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	15.8% Very poor	Lighting 19 Reflection 16.8 Parallax 22.5 16% 19.4 fps	MRender 23.4 Gravity 22.6 Splatting 16.5 17% 20.8 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WD5000AAKX-00ERMA0 240GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 21 51 99 11 39 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 321 Write 192 Mixed 205 SusWrite 65.4 44% 196 MB/s	4K Read 19.6 4K Write 51.1 4K Mixed 22.9 86% 31.2 MB/s	DQ Read 219 DQ Write 205 DQ Mixed 115 113% 180 MB/s
Poor: 73% Great: 90%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$35 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 63GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 37 37 38 38 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	44.3% Average	Read 118 Write 38.3 Mixed 45.2 SusWrite 37 44% 59.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.6 107% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 69%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 301GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 163 163 163 165 165 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	88% Excellent	Read 143 Write 141 Mixed 77.3 SusWrite 163 96% 131 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.1 218% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 88% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB 22,320 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1800 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	64.4% Good	MC Read 22.9 MC Write 23 MC Mixed 21.5 64% 22.5 GB/s	SC Read 18.1 SC Write 18.6 SC Mixed 20.1 54% 18.9 GB/s	Latency 62.6 64% 62.6 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 3,999 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $165

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	1,519x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	947x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	556x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	309x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	268x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	236x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	173x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	140x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	107x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	90x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	86x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	81x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $581

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16