Asus X99-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive97.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-A  (all builds)
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 21 '19 at 03:51
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 83
1-Core 89.6
2-Core 158
66% 110 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 676
60% 510 Pts
64-Core 992
61% 992 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
XFX(1682 3001) 3GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.5.2
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.8% Poor
Lighting 35.7
Reflection 25.1
Parallax 33.9
29% 31.6 fps
MRender 26.8
Gravity 42.4
Splatting 34.2
28% 34.5 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk RAID 0 1TB
547GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 493 463 501 456 360 480 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
97.4% Outstanding
Read 820
Write 658
Mixed 270
SusWrite 459
123% 552 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 47.7
4K Mixed 25.7
87% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 173
140% 202 MB/s
Poor: 100%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 108%
PNY SSD2SC480G1CS1754D117-533 480GB
228GB free
Firmware: CS111101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 355 363 370 382 364 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 372
Write 397
Mixed 267
SusWrite 365
79% 350 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 66
4K Mixed 32.7
113% 40.8 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 178
152% 221 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 83%
Great: 98%
Toshiba External USB 3.0 2TB
696GB free, PID d010
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 128 129 128 130 130 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 127
Write 116
Mixed 30
SusWrite 129
132% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2800 C16 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
MC Read 40.4
MC Write 35.2
MC Mixed 41.1
111% 38.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 17.3
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A Builds (Compare 1,978 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A - $240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $763
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback