| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 4.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 82.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | HP Compaq 8200 Elite USDT PC (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1496 |
| Memory | 8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180510 |
| Uptime | 6.9 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 21 '19 at 01:11 |
| Run Duration | 113 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 35% |
PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500S
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
|
67%
Good
|
62% 101 Pts
|
38% 280 Pts
|
18% 284 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon HD 7650A Graphics
MSI(1462 2681) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.1001
|
4.82%
Terrible
|
5% 5.91 fps
|
4% 5.13 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
338GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 308 308 311 311 310 MB/s
|
82.8%
Excellent
|
77% 344 MB/s
|
100% 34.4 MB/s
|
203% 301 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
48.6%
Average
|
48% 16.9 GB/s
|
38% 13.4 GB/s
|
56% 71.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Compaq 8200 Elite USDT PC Builds (Compare 277 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite USDT PC
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2400SIntel $70Bench 60%, 10,987 samples | 136x |
| Core i5-2500SIntelBench 64%, 3,031 samples | 40x |
| Core i3-2120Intel $170Bench 51%, 77,810 samples | 28x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 266x |
| Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples | 3x |
| Radeon R9 M200XAMDBench 10%, 678 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 69% - Good | Total price: $98 |