Lenovo 224362G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 224362G  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 224362G
Memory6.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121012
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 20 '19 at 21:01
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T9400-$55
None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
41.9% Average
Memory 72
1-Core 37.9
2-Core 72.2
41% 60.7 Pts
4-Core 71.7
8-Core 71.8
10% 71.8 Pts
64-Core 72.9
4% 72.9 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Legend(17AA 20E4)
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2555
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.47% Terrible
Lighting 0.57
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.52 fps
MRender 0.43
Gravity 0.57
Splatting 0.74
0% 0.58 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.47%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ5PA128HMCD-01000 128GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AXM0701Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 224 222 223 225 227 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 187
Write 226
Mixed 155
SusWrite 223
45% 198 MB/s
4K Read 10.5
4K Write 30.7
4K Mixed 13.2
49% 18.1 MB/s
DQ Read 98.3
DQ Write 38.7
DQ Mixed 20.3
28% 52.4 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.5% Very poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 5.4
17% 6.07 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 5.7
16% 5.63 GB/s
Latency 96.8
41% 96.8 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback