PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 53.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 33.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus MAXIMUS IV GENE-Z/GEN3 (all builds) |
Memory | 1.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit, |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20111019 |
Uptime | 9.1 Days |
Run Date | Jul 20 '19 at 20:04 |
Run Duration | 173 Seconds |
Run User | RUS-User |
Background CPU | 44% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
49.5%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 431.36
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
53.3%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
141GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 224 288 299 293 277 MB/s
|
63.1%
Good
|
|||
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 73 60 82 70 69 MB/s
|
33.2%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
557GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 131 163 166 172 187 MB/s
|
84.4%
Excellent
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
902GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 88 93 94 94 94 MB/s
|
51%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
|
40.9%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 66x |
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 55x |
Core i7-2700KIntel $89Bench 73%, 20,692 samples | 27x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 21x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 17x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 16x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 77% - Very good | Total price: $581 |