Asus TUF GAMING FX504GE_FX80GE

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	33.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Asus TUF GAMING FX504GE_FX80GE (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX504GE
Memory	5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190610
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 20 '19 at 20:01
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	URY-User
Background CPU	8%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8300H 167,898 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	84.4% Excellent	Memory 85.8 1-Core 127 2-Core 253 86% 155 Pts	4-Core 447 8-Core 692 70% 569 Pts	64-Core 696 43% 696 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 84.4% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile) 105,856 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 18FE) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3086 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	33.9% Below average	Lighting 43.1 Reflection 31.8 Parallax 38.3 35% 37.7 fps	MRender 38.8 Gravity 41.3 Splatting 36.4 32% 38.8 fps
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 31%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
CT250MX500SSD4 250GB 16,301 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 98GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 413 414 398 399 396 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 438 Write 394 Mixed 390 SusWrite 402 92% 406 MB/s	4K Read 30.6 4K Write 80.3 4K Mixed 47.8 150% 52.9 MB/s	DQ Read 368 DQ Write 298 DQ Mixed 256 213% 307 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 121%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 677GB free Firmware: JU0C0J SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 106 106 106 105 105 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	73.9% Very good	Read 151 Write 144 Mixed 43.2 SusWrite 106 80% 111 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 0.7 214% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GB 73,050 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	45.7% Average	MC Read 18.1 MC Write 15.4 MC Mixed 11.8 43% 15.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 15.5 45% 15.6 GB/s	Latency 71.4 56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING FX504GE_FX80GE Builds (Compare 1,492 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GE_FX80GE

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	946x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	546x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	860x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples	632x

SSD
HFM128GDJTNG-8310A 128GBBench 95%, 6,558 samples	256x
RBUSNS8154P3128GJ 128GBKingstonBench 81%, 18,233 samples	158x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	91x

RAM
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples	378x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	198x
HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 1x16GBHynixBench 44%, 33,430 samples	76x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16