HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	2.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1494
Memory	1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20111110
Uptime	124.2 Days
Run Date	Jul 20 '19 at 14:47
Run Duration	122 Seconds
Run User	SVN-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	74.9% Very good	Memory 89.7 1-Core 90.8 2-Core 164 69% 115 Pts	4-Core 348 8-Core 350 47% 349 Pts	64-Core 349 22% 349 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9500 GS 1,408 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sapphire(174B 9600) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.0 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	2.43% Terrible	Lighting 2.87 Reflection 5.19 Parallax 0.84 2% 2.97 fps	MRender 4.76 Gravity 1.8 Splatting 3.13 3% 3.23 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.43% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32 107,978 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 362GB free (System drive) Firmware: HP64 SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 31 30 36 35 36 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	11.4% Very poor	Read 7.3 Write 35.3 Mixed 15.3 SusWrite 31.8 16% 22.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 98% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 11.4% Great: 70%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249 29,211 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 742GB free Firmware: MN6O SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 73 80 82 79 73 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	51.9% Above average	Read 104 Write 96.1 Mixed 65 SusWrite 76.3 63% 85.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 2x2GB 3,379 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	49.2% Average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 18 MC Mixed 15.3 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 15.2 SC Mixed 14.1 40% 14.1 GB/s	Latency 67.6 59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 1,761 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	684x
Core i7-2600Intel $195Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	592x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	315x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	423x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	137x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	86x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	55x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	33x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	30x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	22x
HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 16GBHynixBench 49%, 20 samples	14x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16