Zoostorm 7910-4367A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	31.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Zoostorm 7910-4367A (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK H81M-K
Memory	6.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130819
Uptime	4.9 Days
Run Date	Jul 20 '19 at 14:38
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	34%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$75 176,321 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	57% Above average	Memory 57.3 1-Core 99.7 2-Core 185 63% 114 Pts	4-Core 305 8-Core 450 47% 378 Pts	64-Core 451 28% 451 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 78%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15 230,189 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 8534) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	3.93% Terrible	Lighting 3.93 Reflection 6.35 Parallax 6.59 3% 5.62 fps	MRender 9.24 Gravity 2.47 Splatting 7.65 5% 6.45 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.93% Great: 3%
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 85CD) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.67 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	31.3% Below average	Lighting 38.9 Reflection 30.1 Parallax 36.8 32% 35.3 fps	MRender 38.2 Gravity 39.1 Splatting 35.1 30% 37.5 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 33%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k
SanDisk X400 512GB-$99 7,913 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 41GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0000 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 2,723 Write 48.5 Mixed 92.7 199% 955 MB/s	4K Read 72.3 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 5.5 118% 26.8 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 104%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 418GB free Firmware: 0A80 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 107 Write 93 Mixed 73.2 68% 91 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 191% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial ST102464BA160B.16F 2x8GB 1,015 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	51.6% Above average	MC Read 19.5 MC Write 20.8 MC Mixed 16.8 54% 19 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 13.6 39% 13.7 GB/s	Latency 136 29% 136 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 7910-4367A Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Zoostorm 7910-4367A

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce GT 640NvidiaBench 6%, 34,519 samples	2x

SSD
SSD Plus 240GBSanDisk $28Bench 61%, 133,640 samples	2x

RAM
CT102464BA160B.C16 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 11,058 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $103

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16