Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	36.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0 (all builds)
Memory	4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190308
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 20 '19 at 13:36
Run Duration	107 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	23%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$88 34,310 User benchmarks, average bench 80% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	79.3% Very good	Memory 83.3 1-Core 119 2-Core 244 82% 149 Pts	4-Core 440 8-Core 407 58% 424 Pts	64-Core 463 29% 463 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Gigabyte(1458 3FCB) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.36 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	36.3% Below average	Lighting 42.4 Reflection 53.9 Parallax 47.2 35% 47.9 fps	MRender 44.8 Gravity 49.7 Splatting 49.8 40% 48.1 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 46%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 813GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 115 124 144 156 149 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	79.4% Very good	Read 148 Write 111 Mixed 81.7 SusWrite 129 86% 117 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1.1 193% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 79.4% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 1x8GB 3,554 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	34.7% Below average	MC Read 12.6 MC Write 11.6 MC Mixed 10.3 33% 11.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.2 SC Write 10.8 SC Mixed 9.2 29% 10.1 GB/s	Latency 74.6 54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310M H 2.0 Builds (Compare 3,698 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,068x
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	930x
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	275x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	355x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	296x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	231x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	297x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	158x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $42Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	131x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	157x
HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GBKingstonBench 44%, 32,519 samples	89x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	83x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $263

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16