Lenovo 3269B4G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 3269B4G  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130130
Uptime2 Days
Run DateJul 20 '19 at 12:39
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
52.5% Above average
Memory 71.7
1-Core 75.6
2-Core 130
56% 92.4 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 195
26% 195 Pts
64-Core 188
12% 188 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 600
Nvidia(10DE 0835) 1GB
CLim: 640 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.83
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.22% Terrible
Lighting 3.97
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 3.53
3% 4 fps
MRender 5.48
Gravity 3.97
Splatting 2.83
3% 4.09 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.22%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$24
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 35 35 54 63 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
33% Below average
Read 68.2
Write 60.2
Mixed 43
SusWrite 46.4
40% 54.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
147% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 33%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer 75.A83C1.G010C Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-PB 75.A83C1.G010C Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-PB 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.6% Below average
MC Read 10
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 12.7
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 8
22% 7.57 GB/s
Latency 97.6
41% 97.6 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback