Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics51% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus Crosshair IV Formula  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121009
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 20 '19 at 12:25
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 88.5
1-Core 56.5
2-Core 114
55% 86.2 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 344
35% 286 Pts
64-Core 340
21% 340 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410
Nvidia(10DE 1051) 3GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51% Above average
Lighting 63.5
Reflection 61
Parallax 80.5
52% 68.3 fps
MRender 74.1
Gravity 69.3
Splatting 45.5
50% 63 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 51%
Great: 59%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM01B1Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 484
Write 311
Mixed 282
79% 359 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 65.8
4K Mixed 22.3
97% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 132
107% 155 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 76%
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102
403GB free
Firmware: 3.AAD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 78 78 77 78 78 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
41.3% Average
Read 66.2
Write 49.1
Mixed 48.2
SusWrite 77.6
44% 60.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 43%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
876GB free, PID a006
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 108 108 108 108 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 104
Write 104
Mixed 31
SusWrite 107
115% 86.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1866C9 CMZ16GX3M4A1600C9 CMZ8GX3M2A1866C9 CMZ16GX3M4A1600C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.3% Poor
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 9.7
26% 9.13 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 8
20% 7.1 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $520
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback