Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	90.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2620M 16,111 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	53.3% Above average	Memory 78.8 1-Core 66.7 2-Core 123 55% 89.5 Pts	4-Core 160 8-Core 181 22% 170 Pts	64-Core 186 12% 186 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 53.3% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6470M 4,805 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 161E) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1301.0 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	2.17% Terrible	Lighting 2.83 Reflection 2.88 Parallax 2.34 2% 2.69 fps	MRender 2.24 Gravity 1.9 Splatting 2.65 2% 2.26 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.17% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199 23,857 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 232GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0CB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 415 268 65 63 66 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	90.6% Outstanding	Read 437 Write 422 Mixed 364 SusWrite 208 80% 358 MB/s	4K Read 34.1 4K Write 65.1 4K Mixed 46.1 145% 48.4 MB/s	DQ Read 372 DQ Write 290 DQ Mixed 258 213% 306 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 90.6% Great: 126%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 547GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 419 448 454 455 424 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	96.5% Outstanding	Read 365 Write 400 Mixed 380 SusWrite 430 89% 394 MB/s	4K Read 30.3 4K Write 63.8 4K Mixed 38.2 129% 44.1 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 328 DQ Mixed 351 264% 352 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 96.5% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	41.4% Average	MC Read 14.4 MC Write 14.6 MC Mixed 13.1 40% 14 GB/s	SC Read 11.8 SC Write 13.5 SC Mixed 13.2 37% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 82.8 48% 82.8 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16