Asus P8Z77-V LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics60.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive66.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 11 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V LX  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140721
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 20 '19 at 08:07
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 35%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Memory 93.1
1-Core 110
2-Core 219
83% 141 Pts
4-Core 388
8-Core 578
62% 483 Pts
64-Core 585
39% 585 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$170
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2102 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 431.36
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
60.5% Good
Lighting 236
Reflection 198
Parallax 213
62% 215 fps
MRender 162
Gravity 220
Splatting 176
61% 186 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 57%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 480GB-$126
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 291 153 141 117 105 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 393
Write 392
Mixed 39
SusWrite 202
57% 257 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 70.5
4K Mixed 28.3
80% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 320
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 181
167% 258 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 91%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$70
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 151 149 147 144 148 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 140
Write 146
Mixed 79.5
SusWrite 147
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
214% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 95%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
285GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 126 124 125 123 125 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 120
Write 116
Mixed 76.3
SusWrite 125
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 108%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$106
875GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 96 96 96 95 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 102
Write 104
Mixed 71.7
SusWrite 95
69% 93.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 100%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$97
680GB free
Firmware: MX6O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 131 129 129 130 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 136
Write 133
Mixed 30
SusWrite 130
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
149% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 109%
Disk drive 1TB
587GB free, PID b001
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 65 65 65 64 65 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
25% Poor
Read 68
Write 68.5
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 64.8
73% 55.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
25% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 25%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C11 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
57.4% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 17.2
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 19.3
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 61.8
65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical P8Z77-V LX Builds (Compare 5,109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $524
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $185Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $142Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $43
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $36Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $548SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback