Asus P8B75-M

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	14.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	58.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8B75-M (all builds)
Memory	14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120803
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 20 '19 at 05:37
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	31%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	78% Very good	Memory 95.4 1-Core 102 2-Core 210 79% 136 Pts	4-Core 329 8-Core 507 52% 418 Pts	64-Core 514 32% 514 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152 36,698 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Zotac(19DA 4263) 2GB CLim: 941 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	14.8% Very poor	Lighting 17.7 Reflection 16.2 Parallax 21.5 14% 18.4 fps	MRender 22 Gravity 21.5 Splatting 15.3 16% 19.6 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 417GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 70 73 76 76 76 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	58.3% Above average	Read 208 Write 340 Mixed 213 SusWrite 73.4 47% 209 MB/s	4K Read 32 4K Write 64.3 4K Mixed 40.5 134% 45.6 MB/s	DQ Read 42.3 DQ Write 112 DQ Mixed 56.4 49% 70.4 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 134%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 318GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 75 74 76 76 76 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	45.2% Average	Read 82.3 Write 73.7 Mixed 46 SusWrite 74.8 51% 69.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 165% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 88%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 43GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 38 38 38 39 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	21.6% Poor	Read 37.4 Write 36 Mixed 31.7 SusWrite 37.7 26% 35.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 105% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 21.6% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB 28,461 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	60.3% Good	MC Read 21.8 MC Write 20.8 MC Mixed 18.7 58% 20.4 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 19.9 54% 18.8 GB/s	Latency 56 72% 56 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8B75-M Builds (Compare 1,498 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M - $470

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	387x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	205x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	131x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	103x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	97x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	87x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	64x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	50x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	44x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	35x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	23x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GBKingstonBench 52%, 19,522 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $906

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16