Asus P8B75-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics20.2% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardAsus P8B75-M  (all builds)
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120803
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 20 '19 at 05:02
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-3770-$266
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
68.3% Good
1-Core 104
2-Core 214
74% 159 Pts
4-Core 393
8-Core 528
60% 460 Pts
64-Core 533
36% 533 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650 Ti-$152
Zotac(19DA 4263) 2GB
CLim: 941 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
20.2% Poor
Lighting 53.4
Reflection 42.3
Parallax 69.4
18% 55 fps
MRender 47
Gravity 65
Splatting 35.5
22% 49.2 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 22%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$103
244GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 70 74 73 74 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 258
Write 346
Mixed 267
SusWrite 71.9
53% 236 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 53.6
4K Mixed 39.2
125% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 40.9
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 54.5
48% 69.6 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 135%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$99
318GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 74 74 74 74 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 79.8
Write 71
Mixed 49.9
SusWrite 73.3
50% 68.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
181% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 88%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$53
43GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 37 39 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
21% Poor
Read 35.1
Write 36.5
Mixed 27.2
SusWrite 37.6
25% 34.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
113% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 21%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
51.2% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15.1
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 18.1
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 62.7
64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 82%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical P8B75-M Builds (Compare 3,117 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M - $470

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $972
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $198AMD RX 580 $172Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
Intel Core i5-9600K $219AMD RX 5700 XT $400Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $195
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $695SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback