Asus P8B75-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
MotherboardAsus P8B75-M  (all builds)
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120803
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 20 '19 at 05:02
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$184
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Memory 92.7
1-Core 104
2-Core 214
80% 137 Pts
4-Core 393
8-Core 528
60% 460 Pts
64-Core 533
36% 533 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
Zotac(19DA 4263) 2GB
CLim: 941 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Lighting 53.4
Reflection 42.3
Parallax 69.4
14% 55 fps
MRender 47
Gravity 65
Splatting 35.5
18% 49.2 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 19%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$140
244GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 70 74 73 74 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 258
Write 346
Mixed 267
SusWrite 71.9
53% 236 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 53.6
4K Mixed 39.2
125% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 40.9
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 54.5
48% 69.6 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 134%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$92
318GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 74 74 74 74 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 79.8
Write 71
Mixed 49.9
SusWrite 73.3
50% 68.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
181% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 88%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$52
43GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 37 39 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
21% Poor
Read 35.1
Write 36.5
Mixed 27.2
SusWrite 37.6
25% 34.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
113% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 21%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.2% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15.1
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 18.1
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 62.7
64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical P8B75-M Builds (Compare 977 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M - $470

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $879
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $192Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $43
Intel Core i5-9400F $151Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $319Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $47
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $60SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback