Lenovo 2356FS1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 2356FS1  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 2356FS1
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170504
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 20 '19 at 00:07
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3520M
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
61.2% Good
Memory 81
1-Core 98.8
2-Core 188
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 242
8-Core 239
32% 241 Pts
64-Core 238
15% 238 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia NVS 5200M
Legend(17AA 2200) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9125
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
3.42% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 4.85
Parallax 2.06
3% 3.6 fps
MRender 4.71
Gravity 4.6
Splatting 4.87
4% 4.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.42%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 180GB-$140
119GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LE1i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 166 166 167 161 170 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 353
Write 201
Mixed 238
SusWrite 168
54% 240 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 57.3
4K Mixed 31.3
111% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 299
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 222
170% 233 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73BH0-CK0 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
56.1% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 18
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 18.8
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback