MSI 760GM-P34(FX) (MS-7641)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive11.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI Z1-7641
MotherboardMSI 760GM-P34(FX) (MS-7641)  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140313
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 19 '19 at 23:42
Run Duration289 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4300-$73
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Memory 79.3
1-Core 66.9
2-Core 116
55% 87.5 Pts
4-Core 193
8-Core 194
26% 194 Pts
64-Core 187
12% 187 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon 3000 Graphics
MSI(1462 7641) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.47% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 1.31
Parallax 0.16
0% 0.65 fps
MRender 0.81
Gravity 0.1
Splatting 1.09
1% 0.67 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.47%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 109 112 32 24 25 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
11.5% Very poor
Read 50.5
Write 28.5
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 58.3
10% 43.5 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 5.5
19% 5.73 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 102%
Hitachi HDS721064CLA332 640GB
162GB free
Firmware: JPGO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 109 113 32 24 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 101
Write 88
Mixed 55
SusWrite 58.3
56% 75.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 66%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 2TB
414GB free
Firmware: 0302
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Read 27
Write 25.5
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 15
17% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$32
88GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 107 113 32 24 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 104
Write 67.5
Mixed 58
SusWrite 58.1
53% 71.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
132% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 112%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
29GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 0 0.1 6.4 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
7.45% Terrible
Read 24.5
Write 13.5
Mixed 12.2
SusWrite 6.4
17% 14.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.9
61% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.45%
Great: 28%
WD My Passport 1TB
132GB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 27.7
Write 25
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 14.3
29% 22.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.7% Below average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 13.1
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 8.5
21% 7.47 GB/s
Latency 81.8
49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 760GM-P34(FX) (MS-7641) Builds (Compare 196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI 760GM-P34(FX) (MS-7641) - $79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $265
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback