Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2676 v3 135 User benchmarks, average bench 50% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	57.3% Above average	Memory 72.8 1-Core 71.3 2-Core 142 56% 95.3 Pts	4-Core 238 8-Core 275 33% 256 Pts	64-Core 290 18% 290 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 68%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
AWS PVDISK 188GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 132GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 59 61 62 61 63 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	20.8% Poor	Read 18.1 Write 8.5 Mixed 26.9 SusWrite 54.4 20% 27 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 4.8 551% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 20.8% Great: 110%
AWS PVDISK 107GB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 100GB free Firmware: 2.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 63 61 61 61 59 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	64.3% Good	Read 151 Write 174 Mixed 144 SusWrite 69.6 100% 135 MB/s	4K Read 7.9 4K Write 5.8 4K Mixed 4.9 981% 6.2 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x16GB 15,722 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1 of 1 slots used 16GB DIMM RAM Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	92.2% Outstanding	MC Read 35.3 MC Write 40.8 MC Mixed 33.8 105% 36.6 GB/s	SC Read 10.3 SC Write 13.8 SC Mixed 17.1 39% 13.7 GB/s	Latency 95.1 42% 95.1 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 92.2% Great: 115%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 60%

Destroyer

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 55%

Gunboat

CPU
Xeon E5-2623 v4IntelBench 59%, 42 samples	16x
Xeon Gold 5315YIntelBench 71%, 25 samples	14x
Xeon Silver 4215RIntelBench 62%, 17 samples	13x

GPU
Quadro RTX 4000NvidiaBench 98%, 9,173 samples	9x
RTX A4000NvidiaBench 132%, 4,246 samples	7x
Quadro RTX 5000NvidiaBench 131%, 1,749 samples	6x

SSD
PVDISK 268GBXensrcBench 53%, 95 samples	53x
PVDISK 2TBXensrcBench 50%, 16 samples	5x
Virtual Disk 107GBMicrosoftBench 60%, 85 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16