To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics14.1% is a very low 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180814
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 19 '19 at 09:04
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core2 Quad Q9400-$170
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
25% Poor
1-Core 44
2-Core 91.4
32% 67.7 Pts
4-Core 150
8-Core 167
21% 159 Pts
64-Core 159
11% 159 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 25%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Zotac(19DA 2476) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Lighting 53.6
Reflection 38.3
Parallax 54.6
14% 48.8 fps
MRender 32.4
Gravity 56
Splatting 45.4
14% 44.6 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 16%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST500DM005 HD502HJ 500GB
428GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 21 33 39 46 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
43% Average
Read 116
Write 116
Mixed 66
SusWrite 33.9
61% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
180% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 43%
Great: 78%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 250GB-$29
136GB free
Firmware: GM2OA52A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 79 79 79 75 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 81.5
Write 79.5
Mixed 49
SusWrite 76.8
53% 71.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 50%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
319GB free
Firmware: JP2OA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 75 79 79 79 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 126
Write 115
Mixed 59
SusWrite 76.9
69% 94.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
MC Read 5.7
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 4.9
16% 5.53 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 4.8
14% 4.87 GB/s
Latency 89.5
45% 89.5 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 62%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 6,119 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 24% - Poor Total price: $56
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
Intel Core i5-9600K $219Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $102
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $198AMD RX 580 $173Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $42G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $695SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback